Extraction, Phytochemical Screening and Antibacterial Activity of Zingiber officinale Rhizome extracts against Microorganism

 

Aman Choudhary*, Rita Saini, Shivanand M. Patil

Department of Pharmacy, Shree Dev Bhoomi Institute of Education Science and Technology,

Pondha, Dehradun, Uttarakhand – 248007.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: aman12akc2@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

Background: The examination of plant-based substitutes is required due to the growing resistance of harmful microbes to traditional antibiotics. The growth of antibiotic-resistant bacteria presents a significant threat to public health, necessitating the development of alternative antimicrobial drugs. Zingiber officinale (ginger) has long been utilized for its therapeutic characteristics, including antibacterial activity. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential of Zingiber officinale as a natural antimicrobial agent by assessing the phytochemical components and antibacterial activity of rhizome extracts against Escherichia coli. Method: The rhizomes of fresh ginger were washed, dried, and then crushed into a coarse powder. Petroleum ether, chloroform, and ethanol were used in the maceration process for extraction. To find substances such flavonoids, alkaloids, phenols, terpenoids, tannins, steroids, and glycosides, the extracts underwent qualitative phytochemical screening. The agar well diffusion technique was used to evaluate the antibacterial activity at doses of 50, 100, and 150mg/ml. The standard reference was ciprofloxacin (30mg/ml). Results: In comparison to petroleum ether extracts (16mm) and chloroform (19mm), ethanol extract exhibited the strongest antibacterial activity and the richest phytochemical profile, with a maximal inhibition zone of 22mm at 150mg/ml concentration. Ethanol extract demonstrated exceptional effectiveness with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 100mg/ml. Conclusion: Based on the results, Zingiber officinale rhizome has strong antibacterial properties, especially its ethanol extract. This demonstrates that it may be used to treat bacterial infections as a natural substitute for conventional antibiotics.

 

KEYWORDS: E. coli, agar plate, well diffusion method, zingiber officinale, rhizome, antibacterial.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

The developing resistance of microbial infections to traditional antibiotics has prompted the investigation of alternative therapeutic agents, especially Zingiber officinale Roscoe, or ginger, which has attracted significant attention for its numerous medical characteristics.

 

Historically utilized throughout several cultures, ginger demonstrates potential antibacterial properties that may offer useful remedies for combating diseases. The bioactive components in ginger, including gingerol and shogaol, contribute to its medicinal properties, which several studies have established for their efficacy against inflammation and bacterial infections1. Previous studies demonstrate that extraction procedures utilizing ethanol provide elevated quantities of these phytochemicals, hence augmenting antibacterial efficacy2. This article will examine Zingiber officinale's extraction and phytochemical screening procedures, assessing its antibacterial activity to support its use as an effective alternative for treating microbial diseases. Zingiber officinale Ginger, also referred to as roscoe, has a long history in traditional medicine and is valued for its many medicinal benefits. Its use extends back to thousands of years, especially in Asian cultures where it was used as a staple cure for respiratory and digestive disorders in addition to being used as a spice. Ginger's ability to adapt in herbal medicinal methods is demonstrated by the fact that it has been used historically in a variety of forms, including fresh, dried, and powdered. Various phytochemical studies have shown that ginger contains substances including shogaol and gingerol, which have strong antibacterial properties and support the plant's therapeutic benefits3. The gingerols were shown to be the main active ingredients in the fresh ginger rhizome. Ginger is detected by the senses due to two different chemical groups: volatile oils and non-volatile pungent chemicals. Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons make up the majority of ginger's volatile oil components, with zingeberene accounting for 35%, curcumene for 18%, and farnesene for 10%4.

 

 

Gingerol                                  Shogaol

 

      

Zingiberene                                              Paradol

Fig 1. components of Zingiber officinale (Ginger).

 

The unique flavor and scent of ginger are attributed to a number of these volatile oil components [Fig:1]. Gingerols, shogaols, paradols, and zingerone are examples of non-volatile pungent chemicals that give the tongue a "hot" feeling.

 

The main active ingredients in the fresh rhizome were found to be the gingerols, a group of chemical homologs distinguished by the length of their unbranched alkyl chains. Furthermore, the main strong ingredients in dried ginger are the dehydrated version of the gingerols and another homologous series called shogaols. Similar to gingerol, paradol is created when shogoal is hydrogenated. Oleoresins are an additional component. Vitamins, minerals, lipids, and waxes are all present in ginger5.

 

Table 1: Taxonomy, Distribution, and Botanical Description6

Kingdom:

Plantae

Division:

Magnoliophyta

Class:

Liliopsida

Order:

Zingiberales

Family:

Zingiberaceae

Genus:

Zingiber

Species:

Zingiber officinale Roscoe

 

Taxonomy is a practice and science concerned with classification or categorization which describe in Table 1.  Active ingredients including phenolic and terpene chemicals are prevalent in ginger. The primary phenolic chemicals found in ginger are paradols, shogaols, and gingerols. Gingerols, including 6-, 8-, and 10-gingerol, are the main polyphenols found in fresh ginger. Gingerols can become comparable shogaols with heat treatment or prolonged storage. After being hydrogenated, shogaols can change into paradols7. Ginger contains several other phenolic compounds, including 6-dehydrogingerdione, zingerone, quercetin, and gingerenone-A8.

 

 

Fig 2: A fresh ginger (Zingiber officinale)

 

The public has been seriously threatened by the spread of infectious illnesses caused by bacteria, fungi, and viruses as a result of antibiotic resistance. To combat several harmful germs, a number of herbs and spices have been transformed into natural, potent antimicrobial compounds. Recent reports have indicated that ginger possesses antiviral, antifungal, and antibacterial properties9. Ginger essential oil contains chemicals with lipophilic qualities that increase the permeability of the cytoplasmic membrane and cell wall while also causing fungus to lose membrane integrity. Furthermore, Aspergillus flavus growth, aflatoxin formation, and ergosterol synthesis were all effectively inhibited by ginger essential oil10. By decreasing ergosterol production and altering membrane integrity,

 


Table 2. Antimicrobial activity and potential mechanisms of ginger.

Constituent

Study Type

Potential Mechanisms

Ref

Ginger essential oil

In vitro

Reducing ergosterol biosynthesis; affecting membrane integrity; decreasing the production of fumonisin B1 and fumonisin B2

11

In vitro

Reducing ergosterol biosynthesis; affecting membrane integrity; inhibiting the production of aflatoxin

10

Gingerenone-A and shogaol

In vitro

Inhibiting the activity of 6-hydroxymethyl-7, 8-dihydropterin pyrophosphokinase

12

In vitro

Affecting membrane integrity; inhibiting biofilm formation

13

 

Ginger extract

In vitro

Inhibiting biofilm formation, glucan synthesis, and adherence

14

In vitro

Blocking viral attachment and internalization

15

 


ginger essential oil successfully suppressed Fusarium verticillioides growth in in-vitro research. Additionally, it may reduce the synthesis of fumonisin B1 and fumonisin B211. Ginger has therefore been shown to prevent the growth of several viruses, fungi, and bacteria. These effects may be primarily associated with the inhibition of viral attachment and internalization, ergosterol production, and bacterial biofilm formation (Table 2).

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Plant and other materials:

Collect a fresh ginger about 1kg of Zingiber officinale Roscoe species from a local market. Assemble a chemicals and glassware that are Ethanol (Denatured), Chloroform, Petroleum ether and iodine flask, beaker, conical flask, measuring cylinder, sieve, butter paper, filter paper.

 

 

Fig 3: Chemical stock

 

Methods:

a)    Processing (Drying) of collected Z. officinale rhizomes:

The rhizomes were properly cleaned two or three times using fresh water. Using a small cutter mill that was run by hand, ginger was chopped into tiny bits. Currently, the tiny ginger pieces were air-shaded and allowed to dry for 12hours without being exposed to sunlight, followed by a 72hour night cycle at each location. Following that, the partially dried ginger was allowed to air dry for seven more days at room temperature of 25±2°C and 45±5% relative humidity in a clean, cold, dry, and dark environment16. Periodically, the ginger was weighed using an electronic digital scale to gauge weight loss, and the moisture loss was calculated. When the ginger was thoroughly dried, it was noted that no fungus should form on the garlic or ginger. For future research, the dried ginger was kept in a dark, airtight container17.

 

     

Fig 4: Dry ginger (Zingiber officinale)

b)    Size reduction of Z. officinale rhizomes:

A hammer mill with built-in sieves was used to break up the dried plant material (rhizomes). Between 30 and 40 meshes, they were reduced to an extremely coarse powder particle size. The extremely coarse powder form was kept at a low, regulated temperature and relative humidity in an airtight, covered glass container out of the light18.

 

    

(a)                                                           (b)

      

 (c)                                                        (d)

Fig 5: (a, b) Powder form by using hammer mill, (c, d) coarse powder by using sieves

 

c)     Extraction Techniques:

In maceration, the basic extraction technique, the 50gm plant-prepared raw material is soaked in a 70% solvent [50gm of raw material dip into 250ml of solvent on behalf of ratio 1:5(w/v)] of interest in a coarse or powdered state for at least three days at room temperature with periodic stirring after which it was filtered. The different solvent was used separately i.e. Petroleum ether, Chloroform, Water. After collecting and evaporating the macerate at 60°C using a rotary vacuum evaporator, it was concentrated on a water-bath at 60–70°C to produce a thick extract19,20,21.

 

   

Fig 6: Extraction technique by maceration

 

PHYTOCHEMICAL SCREENING OF EXTRACT:

Using the method described test for alkaloid, saponin, Tannin, Phlobotannin, flavonoid, cardiac glycoside, steroid and Terpenoid, were carried out.

1.     Flavonoid Test:

The samples' aqueous filtrate was mixed with five milliliters (5ml) of diluted ammonia solution, and then concentrated H2SO4 was added. An observation of yellow coloring was interpreted as proof that flavonoids were present22.

 

 

Fig 7: Flavonoid test

 

2.     Alkaloid Test :

Mayer's test: A few drops of Mayer's reagent were added to 1 ml of filtrate. When alkaloids are present, a yellow-colored precipitate will form22.

 

 

Fig 8: Alkaloid test

 

3.     Phenolic Test:

Ferric chloride test: The extracts were treated with 3 to 4 drops of ferric chloride solution. Formation of bluish black colour indicates the presence of Phenols23.

 

 

Fig 9: Phenolic test

 

4.     Terpenoids Test:

2 ml of chloroform was added to 0.5 g of the extract, and then 3 ml of concentrated H2SO4 was carefully added to create a layer. The presence of terpenoids was suggested by the interface's reddish-brown colouring23.

 

 

Fig 10: Terpenoids Test 

5.     Tannis Test:

100ml of distilled water was used to mix 5g of extract and 5ml of honey before they were filtered. The filtrate was treated with ferric chloride reagent. Tannin was present when a blue-black or blue-green precipitate formed23.

 

Fig 11: Tannis test

 

6.     Steroids Test:

0.5g of extract was mixed with 2milliliters (2ml) of acetic anhydride, and 2ml of sulfuric acid was added via the test tube's sides. The color of the mixture was then checked for a shift from violet to blue-green23.

 

 

Fig 12: Steroids test

 

7.     Glycosides Test:

5g of each of the extracts and 5ml of honey was dissolved in 2ml glacial acetic acid containing a drop of ferric chloride solution. This was underplayed with 1ml concentrated H2SO4. A brown ring of the interface indicates a deoxy-sugar characteristic of cardenolides. A violet ring may appear below the brown ring, while in the acetic acid layer, a green ring may form just gradually spread throughout this layer24.

 

 

Fig 13: Glycosides test

 

PREPRATION OF CLUTURE MEDIA AND ISOLATION:

Nutrient agar, which was produced and sterilized at 121 °C and 14 pounds for 14-30 minutes, was the antibacterial medium. Prepare nutrient agar media (meat extract, peptone, sodium chloride, distilled water, agar) and maintain pH level by 7.2±0.229. Pre-sterilized petriplates with a 90 mm diameter were filled with 20–24ml of autoclaved nutritional agar medium under aseptic conditions, and the plates were left to harden in the presence of UV light. Pre-incubation is then applied for 24hours to the prepared plates25.

 

   

 

 

Fig 14. Agar media plate placed in Biological Oxygen Demand incubator (BOD)

 

Isolation of Escherichia coli from Urine:

To reduce contamination, a urine sample was taken using the clean-catch midstream procedure in a sterile container. A calibrated inoculating loop was then used to inoculate the material onto a sterile Nutrient Agar plate. In order to isolate individual colonies, the streaking technique was used. The plate was incubated for 24 hours at 37°C following inoculation26,27. Bacterial growth was seen on the nutrient agar plate after incubation. Round, wet, and off-white or pale colonies were the hallmarks of colonies thought to be Escherichia coli. Gram staining, which showed Gram-negative short rods, a feature of E. coli, further validated these colonies. Particularly in situations of suspected urinary tract infections, this technique aids in the first detection and isolation of E. coli from urine28,29.

 

 

 (a) View at 10x without stain              (b) View at 100x with stain

Fig 14: microscopy images of Escherichia coli.

ANTI-BACTERIAL STUDY AND DETERMINIATION OF ACTIVITY:

The extract was made in three distinct dilutions of 50 mg/ml, 100mg/ml, and 150mg/ml. These dilutions were tested for antibacterial activity in conjunction with 30 mg/ml of the standard antibiotic (ciprofloxacin) that was dissolved in distilled water30. Antimicrobial activity was determined using the first Agar well diffusion technique, which is in accordance with the guidelines suggested by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). They took the pre-incubated plates and used a spreader to disseminate the germs through them31. A metallic hollow road was used to bore the well into agar plates once the bacteria had dried. After that, 30µl of the common antibiotic ciprofloxacin and 100µl of extracts were placed onto sterile discs and incubated for 24 hours. The widths of the inhibitory zones on each plate were measured in millimetres following incubation32.

 

Measurements of zone of inhibition:

The antibacterial spectrum of the extracts was evaluated in terms of the zones of inhibition surrounding the wells following plate incubation. Antibiotic-induced zone of inhibition widths was contrasted with those generated by the plant extract. During the tests, the average zone diameter was measured. Cache plate findings were measured by measuring the zone diameter (mm) generated by plant extract of various solvents after 24-26 hours of incubation at 37°C33

 

 

Fig 15: Agar plate

 

RESULT AND DISCUSSION:

Phytochemical screening:

The phytochemical screening test was conducted using different solvents such as ethanol, chloroform, petroleum ether and crude extract of Zingiber officinale Roscoe rhizome were summarized in Table 3. The result obtained from this study pointed that the tannins, alkaloids, Flavonoids, phenol, terpenoids, steroids, glycosides.

 

Table 3. Phytochemical screening of Zingiber officinale.

S. No

Test

Ethanol

Chloroform

Pet. ether

1.

Flavonoids

+

-

-

2.

Alkaloids

+

+

-

3.

Phenol

+

+

-

4.

Terpenoids

+

+

+

5.

Tannins

+

-

-

6.

Steroids

-

+

+

7.

Glycosides

+

-

-

Indicate: (+) present, (-) negative

 

Antibacterial:

The antibacterial activity of crude extract of Zingiber officinale Roscoe rhizome was tested by agar well diffusion method. The extract of plant leaves has been found to be potent against Escherichia coli. The antibacterial activity of Zingiber officinale Roscoe rhizome extract of different solvent is summarised in Table 4. Ethanol extract shown the maximum inhibition zone against Escherichia coli. (22mm) in 150mg/ml concentration and minimum against petroleum ether extract (16mm). As in 100mg/ml maximum inhibition in ethanol extract (18mm) and chloroform extract (15mm) and petroleum ether (12mm). Then inhibition in petroleum ether extract has not shown well proper anti-bacterial activity.

 

Table 4: Minimum inhibitory concentration of Zingiber officinale Roscoe plant

Extract

Standard (Ciprofloxacine) in mm

50 mg/ml

100 mg/ml

150 mg/ml

MIC

Ethanol

30mm

12mm

18mm

22mm

100 mg/ml

Chloroform

30mm

10mm

15mm

19mm

150 mg/ml

Pet. Ether

30mm

8mm

12mm

16mm

>150 mg/ml

 

 

Graph 1. Zone of inhibition vs. Concentration

 

CONCLUSION:

Phytochemicals isolated from Zingiber officinale Roscoe rhizome leaf extract may have antibacterial properties, according to the study mentioned above. The extract of certain solvents may include antimicrobial substances. The plant's antibacterial properties can be investigated further for potential application in the management of bacterial infections. It is possible to utilize the raw extract of Zingiber officinale Roscoe rhizome to combat certain bacteria. Zingiber officinale Roscoe rhizome crude extract may be a superior substitute for traditional antibacterial food additives. It has also long been established that Zingiber officinale Roscoe rhizome leaf crude extract possesses antimicrobial properties.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this research work. The study was conducted independently without any financial or commercial support that could influence the results. All findings and interpretations are based solely on the experimental data, ensuring objectivity and integrity in the presentation of the research outcomes.

 

DISCLAIMER STATEMENT:

There are no conflicting interests, according to the authors. Products that are often utilized in research were employed in this study. The writers and product manufacturers do not have any conflicts of interest.

 

REFERENCE:

1.      Levita J, Mutakin M, Diantini A. A Review: Is Ginger (Zingiber officinale var. Roscoe) Potential for Future Phytomedicine? Indonesian Journal of Applied Sciences. 2018 Apr; 8(1):1–6.

2.      Thakur K, Devi DrA, Kumar DrS. Formulation and evaluation of antimicrobial potential of glycerosomes containing allium sativum, Zingiber officinale extracts. Journal of Advanced Zoology. 2023 Oct; 44(S2):1264–1288.

3.      BHOVİ VK. Plants based materials as the antifungal and antibacterial agents. International Journal of Plant-based Pharmaceuticals. 2022 Feb 1; 2(1):98–110.

4.      Gupta S kumar, Sharma A. Medicinal properties of Zingiber officinale Roscoe - A Review. IOSR Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences. 2014; 9(5):124–9.

5.      Liang J, Stöppelmann F, Schoenbach J, Rigling M, Nedele AK, Zhang Y, et al. Influence of peeling on volatile and non-volatile compounds responsible for aroma, sensory, and nutrition in ginger (Zingiber officinale). Food Chemistry [Internet]. 2023 Sep; 419:136036.

6.      Marwat SK, Shoaib M, Khan EA, Ullah H, et al. Phytochemistry and Bioactivities of Quranic Plant, Zanjabil-Ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe): A Review. American-Eurasian J Agric and Environ Sci. 2015; 15(5):707–713.

7.      Stoner GD. Ginger: Is it Ready for Prime Time? Cancer Prevention Research. 2013 Apr 1; 6(4):257–62.

8.      Ji K, Fang L, Zhao H, Li Q, Shi Y, Xu C, et al. Ginger Oleoresin Alleviated γ-Ray Irradiation-Induced Reactive Oxygen Species via the Nrf2 Protective Response in Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2017; 2017:1480294.

9.      Moon, YS., Lee, HS. and Lee, SE. Inhibitory effects of three monoterpenes from ginger essential oil on growth and aflatoxin production of Aspergillus flavus and their gene regulation in aflatoxin biosynthesis. Appl Biol Chem. 2018; 61: 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13765-018-0352-x

10.   Samuel Botião Nerilo, Rocha G, Tomoike C, Aparecida S, Grespan R, Martha J, et al. Antifungal properties and inhibitory effects upon aflatoxin production by Zingiber officinale essential oil inAspergillus flavus. 2016 Feb 1; 51(2): 286–92.

11.   ‌Yamamoto-Ribeiro MMG, Grespan R, Kohiyama CY, Ferreira FD, Mossini SAG, Silva EL, et al. Effect of Zingiber officinale essential oil on Fusarium verticillioides and fumonisin production. Food Chemistry. 2013 Dec; 141(3): 3147–52.

12.   ‌Rampogu S, Baek A, Gajula RG, Zeb A, Bavi RS, Kumar R, et al. Ginger (Zingiber officinale) phytochemicals—gingerenone-A and shogaol inhibit SaHPPK: molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations and in vitro approaches. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials. 2018 Apr 2; 17(1).

13.   Chakotiya AS, Tanwar A, Narula A, Sharma RK. Zingiber officinale: Its antibacterial activity on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and mode of action evaluated by flow cytometry. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2017 Jun; 107: 254–60.

14.   Hasan S, Danishuddin M, Khan AU. Inhibitory effect of zingiber officinale towards Streptococcus mutans virulence and caries development: in vitro and in vivo studies. BMC Microbiology. 2015; 15(1): 1.

15.   Chang JS, Wang KC, Yeh CF, Shieh DE, Chiang LC. Fresh ginger (Zingiber officinale) has anti-viral activity against human respiratory syncytial virus in human respiratory tract cell lines. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2013 Jan; 145(1): 146–51.

16.   Supu RD, Diantini A, Levita J. Red ginger (Zingiber officinale var. rubrum): its chemical constituents, pharmacological activities and safety. fitofarmaka: Jurnal Ilmiah Farmasi. 2019 May 30; 8(1):23–9.

17.   Pan SY, Litscher G, Gao SH, Zhou SF, Yu ZL, Chen HQ, et al. Historical Perspective of Traditional Indigenous Medical Practices: The Current Renaissance and Conservation of Herbal Resources. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2014 Apr 27; 2014(525340): 1–20.

18.   Shiva S, Anjana P, Navami MV, Sreedhar KM, Sreekanth KM, Sivasubramanian G. Bioactive potential enhancement of Ginger (Zingiber officinale) through ball-mill assisted micronization. Food Chemistry Advances. 2025 March; 7(100970): 100970.

19.   Syarif RA, Faradiba F, Alyanti TK, Savitri TA. GC-MS Analysis of Ginger Rhizome with Various Extraction Methods. Jurnal Fitofarmaka Indonesia. 2024 Dec; 11(3): 107–114.

20.   Bitwell C, Indra SS, Luke C, Kakoma MK. A review of modern and conventional extraction techniques and their applications for extracting phytochemicals from plants. Scientific African. 2023 Mar 1; 19:e01585

21.   Nguyen ST, Vo PH, Nguyen TD, Do NM, Le BH, Dinh DT, et al. Ethanol extract of Ginger Zingiber officinale Roscoe by Soxhlet method induces apoptosis in human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line. Biomedical Research and Therapy. 2019 Nov 22; 6(11): 3433–42.

22.   An K, Zhao D, Wang Z, Wu J, Xu Y, Xiao G. Comparison of different drying methods on Chinese ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe): Changes in volatiles, chemical profile, antioxidant properties, and microstructure. Food Chemistry. 2016 Apr; 197: 1292–300.

23.   Lucky E, Igbinosa OE, Jonahan I. Antimicrobial Activity of Zingiber officinale Against Multidrug Resistant Microbial Isolates. Health Sciences Research. 2017 Nov; 4(6): 76–81.

24.   Bhargava S, Dhabhai K, Batra A, Sharma A, Malhotra B. Zingiber Officinale : Chemical and phytochemical screening and evaluation of its antimicrobial activities. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research. 2012; 4(1): 360–364.

25.   Pandey N, Walia A. Datura stramonium leaves: A Potential Element of Anti –Microbial Activity. Universities Journal of Phytochemistry and Ayurvedic Heights. 2024 Dec 7; II(37).

26.   Sabir S, Anjum AA, Ijaz T, Ali MA, Rehman MU, Nawaz M. Isolation and antibiotic susceptibility of E. coli from urinary tract infections in a tertiary care hospital. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 1969 Dec 31; 30(2).

27.   Vranic S, Uzunovic A. Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia Coli Strains Isolated from Urine at Outpatient Population: a Single Laboratory Experience. Materia Socio Medica. 2016; 28(2): 121.

28.   Russo TA, Carlino UB, Mong A, Jodush ST. Identification of Genes in an Extraintestinal Isolate of Escherichia coli with Increased Expression after Exposure to Human Urine. Infection and Immunity. 1999 Oct 1; 67(10): 5306–14.

29.   Prevalence and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Escherichia Coli Isolated from Urine Samples of Urinary Tract Infection Patients. ARC Journal of Urology. 2019; 4(1).

30.   Mainasara MM, Aliero BL, et.al. Phytochemical and Antibacterial Properties of Root and Leaf Extracts of Calotropis procera. Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied Science. 2012 Mar; 20(1): 1–6.

31.   De S, Pramanik A, Das AK, Paul S, Jana S, Pramanik P. Isolation and characterization of Lactobacillus spp. from curd and its pharmacological application in probiotic chocolate. The Journal of Phytopharmacology. 2017 Dec; 6(6): 335–339.

32.   Athanassiadis B, Abbott P, George N, Walsh L. Anin vitrostudy of the antimicrobial activity of some endodontic medicaments and their bases using an agar well diffusion assay. Australian Dental Journal. 2009 Jun; 54(2): 141–6.

33.   Nyamath S, Karthikeyan B. In vitro antibacterial activity of lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus) leaves extract by agar well method. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2018 May; 7(3): 1185–1188.

 

 

Received on 23.05.2025      Revised on 11.09.2025

Accepted on 12.11.2025      Published on 22.01.2026

Available online from January 29, 2026

Asian J. Pharm. Res. 2026; 16(1):44-50.

DOI: 10.52711/2231-5691.2026.00006

©Asian Pharma Press All Right Reserved

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License.